Search results

But why does the rulling precise that you can look at his hand if he's supposed to have no copy of the card in hand? The two situations are to avoid cheat but have different rullings. Strange.

If you can not check his hand, you are not forced to trust him as you can check opponent's deck when you remove a flip with NoC. For example, he could have another copie of the card in his hand but because you can not check, he can say that he drew it later. If I am wrong, it is a very silly...

Can I check my opponent's hand when I use this card? because it's not really written on the text of the card and Netrep only answer me in the case of my opponent has not the card in hand.

I have 2 traps set on the field (Scapegoat and Torrential Tribute), my oppenent summons Mobius. Could I activate Scapegoat and then Torrential Tribute to destroy Mobius and have token on the field ? Or might I activate Torrential at the exact trigger and so activating Scapegoat becomes useless...

Hello , here is Jack-Wyler. I have known that my post would be more difficult that it looked in a first time lol. I could not read all the pages of the topic (I remind you that I am French , so traslate 11 pages is a lot of work :)). So now am I right or wrong? I want to know .:p See you later.

I would like to know if the sheep token from Scapegoat were destroyed by Daedalus' effect . Because on the card , it is written that the effect destroy all CARDS on the field except itself but I remember that token are not treated as cards Could you explain me ? Am I right or wrong ?

Hello all , I would like to know if Fusilier Dragon, The Dual-Mode Beast's original attack strengh was 1400 or 2800 when it is summoned without tribute . Because my oppenent equipped it with Megamorph and said that its attack become 5600 because its original attack strengh was 2800 but...