this is basically a "pay to activate" question...and a huh? follow up
p1 ( strike ninja/ return deck)has 2 set s/t and strike ninja on field and a big ole' honkin' removed pile
p2 (dasher/phoenix blade/return deck) has a set MoF and has 1 set s/t and 3 in removed pile(2 ddsurvivors and 'reaper)
p1 summons another strike ninja and attacks
p2 in response to atk activates his set rfdd
p1 in response flips royal decree and asks for response from p2 - none - and chains his own rfdd..so - resolve backwards
p1 "returns" and floods field with tomatoes & newdoria
p1 royal decree negates p2 rfdd-monsters never hit field
p1 resumes atks
where we had troulbe was in getting p2 to understand he(and p1) paid to activate his rfdd before chain started resolving, so atks were enough for game
:crying
then p1 says- since royal decree was activated in chain, before all 3 traps went to graveyard, that his returned monsters would stay anyway and he'd have game next turn...
i said "huh?" i thought those returned monsters had a "condition" placed on them to re-remove...before
royal decree resolved....
so i had to ask - 'cause this is gonna come up again....
p1 ( strike ninja/ return deck)has 2 set s/t and strike ninja on field and a big ole' honkin' removed pile
p2 (dasher/phoenix blade/return deck) has a set MoF and has 1 set s/t and 3 in removed pile(2 ddsurvivors and 'reaper)
p1 summons another strike ninja and attacks
p2 in response to atk activates his set rfdd
p1 in response flips royal decree and asks for response from p2 - none - and chains his own rfdd..so - resolve backwards
p1 "returns" and floods field with tomatoes & newdoria
p1 royal decree negates p2 rfdd-monsters never hit field
p1 resumes atks
where we had troulbe was in getting p2 to understand he(and p1) paid to activate his rfdd before chain started resolving, so atks were enough for game
:crying
then p1 says- since royal decree was activated in chain, before all 3 traps went to graveyard, that his returned monsters would stay anyway and he'd have game next turn...
i said "huh?" i thought those returned monsters had a "condition" placed on them to re-remove...before
royal decree resolved....
so i had to ask - 'cause this is gonna come up again....