Ring of Destruction in the Battle Phase

B

BarbWireNDragons

Guest
Player One has no monsters, and 2 face-down spell/trap (Scapegoats & Ring of Destrcution).
Player Two has 2 face-up monsters(Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer "1800atk" & Gatling Dragon "2600atk"), and a face-down spell/trap(Windstorm of Etaqua) My scenario is this:

Player Two declares an attack with Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer. Player One responds by activating Scapegoats. After Scapegoats resolve, Player Two activates Windstorm of Etaqua to switch the tokens to attack posistion. And Player One chains Ring of Destruction to Windstorm of Etaqua targeting Gatling Dragon.

The lifepoints at the begining of the battle phase were:
Player One: 3100
Player Two: 2400

Now, here is my question. Who would win in this scenario. Because they ruled as that Ring of Destruction resloves bringing Player Two's lifepoints down to Zero and that the attack of Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer would still continue because it's attack was never stopped??

Please give me a responce to this, because this did happen today at an officially sanctioned tournament.
 
So, Player One would win because Player Two's lifepoints would be at Zero after Ring of Destruction resolves. And that would not let Kycoo THe Ghost Destroyer's attack continue. Right?
 
BarbWireNDragons said:
So, Player One would win because Player Two's lifepoints would be at Zero after Ring of Destruction resolves. And that would not let Kycoo THe Ghost Destroyer's attack continue. Right?

Yes, Player1 would be the winnder. Play can no longer resume since a Player's Life Pints have reached 0.
 
Not only would the game end there, but Kycoo's attack WAS stopped. Summoning sheep tokens with Scapegoat caused a reply.

As they said above, zero points game over. Even if Kycoo had declare another attack on one of the sheep tokens before windstorm and ring were played; it wouldn't have mattered.

yugi
 
Back
Top