I saw this on the organized play forums
link: http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/op/community/forums/thread/748971.aspx
The scenario:
TP activates his Soul Exchange targeting opponent's Sangan. NTP has no cards in hand.
TP tributes for Thestalos.
Answer from Curtis:
I understood Curtis explanation, but something sounds strange to me (bolded part): the effect of Sangan doesn't activate as a result of him being tributed, but because he goes to the grave.
I can be overthinking about it (usually I do that) but doesn't this kind of situation leads to dangerous interpretations? It sounds like the tribute summon had a spell speed, since the appearence of Thestalos on the field and Sangan reaching the grave are not being treated as simultaneos events, thus forming a SEGOC. And this is confusing me a bit...
Sorry if it sounds strange, but I hope someone understood my doubt and help me understand this.
Thanks in advance.
link: http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/op/community/forums/thread/748971.aspx
The scenario:
TP activates his Soul Exchange targeting opponent's Sangan. NTP has no cards in hand.
TP tributes for Thestalos.
Answer from Curtis:
When you Tribute a monster with a mandatory Trigger Effect that activates as a result of the monster being Tributed, the Tributed monster's effect is placed first on the Chain.
Refering to this situation, "Sangan" is placed first onto the Chain because its Trigger Effect activated when it was Tributed, followed by "Thestalos the Firestorm Monarch".
"Thestalos the Firestorm Monarch's" effect will resolve first, followed by "Sangan".
I understood Curtis explanation, but something sounds strange to me (bolded part): the effect of Sangan doesn't activate as a result of him being tributed, but because he goes to the grave.
I can be overthinking about it (usually I do that) but doesn't this kind of situation leads to dangerous interpretations? It sounds like the tribute summon had a spell speed, since the appearence of Thestalos on the field and Sangan reaching the grave are not being treated as simultaneos events, thus forming a SEGOC. And this is confusing me a bit...
Sorry if it sounds strange, but I hope someone understood my doubt and help me understand this.
Thanks in advance.