I was thinking (again) about this issue, and other strange situation occured to me:
JT is in his Battle Step and have 1 face-up Jinzo and one face-up DD Assailant. NJT has only 2 set s/t.
JT declares he is attacking directly with DDA and pass. NJT responds activating Book of Moon, targeting Jinzo. JT does not respond. Now, I (and some others) believe the response window is closed, and both players could only activate cards without "when your opponent declares an attack..." requirement.
But, if the link to the declaration of the attack is still "lingering" and as BS admits multiple chains, NJT could now activate Sak Armor, targeting DDA.
Was it a legal activation? (I believe it's not...)
Thanks
JT is in his Battle Step and have 1 face-up Jinzo and one face-up DD Assailant. NJT has only 2 set s/t.
JT declares he is attacking directly with DDA and pass. NJT responds activating Book of Moon, targeting Jinzo. JT does not respond. Now, I (and some others) believe the response window is closed, and both players could only activate cards without "when your opponent declares an attack..." requirement.
But, if the link to the declaration of the attack is still "lingering" and as BS admits multiple chains, NJT could now activate Sak Armor, targeting DDA.
Was it a legal activation? (I believe it's not...)
Thanks