Search results

Just because they removed Change from the ban list doesnt mean that it cant go back on in re-evaluation. Mind Control at least prevents the typical first turn 3000+ easy rush while preserving some form of strategy.

Its essentially the same as parasite paracide.

If destroying a Spell or Trap card is indeed a cost, and all costs on a card are paid on activation, wouldnt the targeted card automatically be destroyed before the opponent can respond?

What im asking is that when I activate Stamping Destruction is the targeted spell or trap card destroyed on activation as a cost TO inflict the damage? EDIT: I'm not arguing that the targeted card has to be destroyed to inflict damage.

Stamping Destruction You can activate this card only when you have a face-up Dragon-Type monster on your side of the field. Destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card on the field to inflict 500 points of Direct Damage to the destroyed card's controller. Comparing this to the lvl monsters, does the "destroy...

In a 40 card deck the odds are fairly low that if you shuffle in one card you will immediately redraw the same card. Naturally the odds increase as the deck shrinks but I do not assume that it will wind down to nothing quickly. At first Lighten the Load does not provide much advantage but the...

When the winner gets his Cyber-Stein I wonder what noise he would make if it slipped out of his hands and got bent / ruined? :-o

The ""This card's name is treated as "Umi""" portion of ALO is more of a condition then an actual effect. This is similar to Dark Ruler Ha Des not being able to be revived from the graveyard or certain fusion monsters only being able to be fusion summoned or summoned by its exact fusion material...

I have been shamed by my oversight :-(.  Well, in my defense I did search the yahoo groups a good number of times, just not recently enough to catch that without it slipping too far behind in the listings. Anyway, my question has been throughly answered.

Is there any official website that holds these issued rulings on an archive or something, this is the first time ive ever heard of this apparently long standing ruling and id like to know where to get the latest information. :| I also find it odd ive never seen it on the yahoo netrep group or...

Yeah, I saw those. However it's not solid enough for me to state that without endless counter arguments against it.

Command Knight's current printed text: "As long as at least 1 other monster exists on your side of the field, your opponent cannot select this card as an attack target. Also, as long as this card remains face-up on the field, increase the ATK of all Warrior-Type monsters by 400 points." I was...

So just for a flat out answer/ruling, will Command Knight's effect be errata'ed to "... increase the ATK of all OF YOUR Warrior-Type monsters by 400 points."?