Ectoplasmic Subjugation

pssvr said:
Indeed it would. Though I don't reccommend that angle, because it is difficult to maintain a monster-like field control with this deck. And by "difficult" I mean nearly impossible.

-pssvr
Click to expand...

Are we forgetting the build that this deck has? It isn't hard to maintain a monster field presence with THIS deck.
Although, Des Wombat wouldn't do to well, as while it isn't hard to maintain face-down monster field presence, Face-up is a whole nother story.

-solitarywolf17-
 
Well in the next set Shadow of infinity, there is a new card coming out that I think I would definately love to put in here.

Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder
Light/Thunder/10/4000/4000

This card cannot be Normal Summoned. This card cannot be special summon other than by sending 3
face-up Continuous Spell cards from your field to the Graveyard. When this card destroys an
opponent's monster and sends it to the Graveyard, do 1000 damage to your opponent's lifepoints.
When this card is on the field in face-up defense mode, your opponent cannot choose other
monsters as the target of an attack.


So what do you guys think of the benefits of having Hamon in this deck? I mean I do run a good amount of continuous spell cards, at least 10.
Plus he would be able to get my stall cards off the field and allow me to attack, destroying a monster, and then inflicting 1000 lp damage to my opponent. I am a burn after all. He might be great as a mid to late game finisher. Plus he can get to the field a lot faster than either Uria or Raviel.

Anyway, let me know what you guys think.

I'll think of what to take out in order to put him in in the meantime.

-solitarywolf17
 
another good combo with ecto is to use horus l6 to help maintain field presence( since ecto is not a cost, horus will remain unaffected by it, that is to say if you want field presence) all in all its a good idea, hope you do well with it :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top