Force of the Breaker - Thoughts?

[drzero7]

If Heavy Storm gets banned, then they need to ban Gravity Bind, LLAB, SoRL, and couple other continuous s/t along with it cause stall/burn deck, PACMAN deck, etc. get's too powerful.

 

[DH2K4]

If Heavy Storm gets banned, then they need to ban Gravity Bind, LLAB, SoRL, and couple other continuous s/t along with it cause stall/burn deck, PACMAN deck, etc. get's too powerful.

Why the hell would they need to ban them for...

I'll say it now - DUH! - What the hell do you think all the extra S/T destroyers are for, we got Twister which can be run in 3's and can get rid of any and all face-up S/T's, we got the Chain Link Version of MST, and we got Tornado, for people who play 3+ S/Ts.

EDIT - We still can use 3x Dust Tornado as well..I mean come on....

/end rant

It is annoying when people say when "Card X is banned, these need to be banned too" even though we got PLENTY of ways to deal with them....

 

[bjswp56]

It is annoying when people say when "Card X is banned, these need to be banned too" even though we got PLENTY of ways to deal with them....

Your argument is sound in that there are plenty of ways to take out Spell and Trap cards in the game without Heavy Storm. Yet, so is drzero7's argument on banning certain stall cards if Heavy Storm were banned. You are entitled to your opinion, as is drzero7.

I seriously doubt Heavy Storm will be banned because of the issues cited by drzero7. Stall cards would run far too rampant and loading a deck or side deck with so much S/T destruction is no fun at all.

 

[CPMillerWV]

What gets me is the new rulings! Take a look, some are relly a change.

ie. a Cristal Beast being attacked face dow and STILL getting it's effect when if destroyed face down, it dosn't!? Can we say DD Survive/Macro Cosmos?

 

[roadhouse007]

Yeah, that is a little different. But you know how it is, things are the way they are BKSS.