limiter removals

[master-of_chaos]

ey,
i'v got a question about how many limiter removels (or other q.play spell cards) you can activate ones you have declared an atack.

master-of_chaos

 

[Raijinili]

Andrew, sometimes if you give them a chaining explaination it helps better understand how they can legally save their monster. But yeah, I should have said something along the lines of what you did.

But why would you think it's a chain?

 

[squid]

well, in the particular example of IMT and Limiter Removal, the effects can be put into a chain block, or IMT can be activated separately before Limiter begins to resolve the last portion of its effect.

I suppose its simply a matter of choice. Its good to know, if a player goes to resolve Limiter and forgets about IMT, they still have an opportunity to chain and end up with the same results. No?

 

[Tkwiget]

It doesn't have to be put in a chain block, but it can. That's why both explainations work nicely. =)

 

[Digital Jedi]

Actully, I don't think thisd can be put in a chain block. Simply because that suggests that these effects are chainable in the End Phase, which we all know they aren't.

 

[squid]

you know, I remember the conflict debate started over activating and chaining in the End Phase, but I dont recall the end result. Was it decided for certain then, that effects like Limiter Removal's destruction, or Manticore of Darkness' special Summoning, were not chainable.

 

[novastar]

Neither effect forms a chain in the End Phase.

 

[squid]

Well, Im not going to argue with THAT man.

*blinks with big, puppy eyes*

 

[novastar]

They don't Trigger, and don't form Chain Links.

You just simply decide which one you wish to resolve first, then resolve the other afterwords.

But besides that, IMT resets Limiter's effect on the monster.

 

[Raijinili]

Pretty sure Manticore of Darkness is either trigger or ignition.

 

[novastar]

Manticore yes, it is a sort of Optional Trigger or Ignition.

I was refering to Limiter and IMT.