Marauding Captain

frostmonarch

New Member
If I only have two Marauding Captains on my field, can my opponent attack my life points directly if he does not have a monster like Jinzo #7 that has the specific effect of being able to attack an opponent's life points directly? My opponent seems to think that you can bypass the captains and attack my lifepoints with his archfield soldier, much like he could if I only had a Legendary Fisherman on the board.
Thanks
Frostmonarch
 
No they can't.

Legendary Fisherman says they can not attack it. Picture this as puting a wall in front of the fisherman protecting itself and nothing else.

Marauding captains protects monsters other than itself. In this picture, one Marauding captain puts a wall in front of all warriors (including the second Marauding captain) leaving a gap in front if itself. The second Marauding captain does the same thing, thus protecting the first Marauding captain.

Spot's Knight
 
frostmonarch said:
If I only have two Marauding Captains on my field, can my opponent attack my life points directly if he does not have a monster like Jinzo #7 that has the specific effect of being able to attack an opponent's life points directly? My opponent seems to think that you can bypass the captains and attack my lifepoints with his archfield soldier, much like he could if I only had a Legendary Fisherman on the board.
Thanks
Frostmonarch

Unless the opponent has a monster that specifically can attack directly by effect, he cannot declare an attack on your life points. Marauding Captain's effect states that "as long as this card is face up your opponent may not declare an attack on another Warrior Type Monster on the field." It is not preventing all attacks on monsters, just Warriors (Marauding Captain does not include himself in his effect).

You could attack Marauding Captain, but the other Marauding Captain is preventing it, so he is unable to attack since he would have to attack a monster and there is no other monster type on the field to attack.

The Legendary Fisherman is different since he specifically states that "This monster cannot be selected as an attack target." So basically, The Legendary Fisherman is pretty much "invisible" and you can ignore him if he is alone on the field, and attack directly.

"Declaring" an attack is different from "Selecting" an attack target.

Declare: If there is a non-Warrior or face-down card, you must declare that monster as an attack target.

Select: If there is no monster other than Fisherman, you cannot select him, but you may select your opponent as an attack target.


2 Command Knights
You could "almost" make the same argument for Command Knight that he is the same as Fisherman, but his effect states that "as long as 1 other monster is on the field, this card can not be selected as an attack target." So you would have to select the "other" Command Knight, but since he cannot be selected as an attack target either, your opponent cant attack.
 
it's always been said that the TV show is a horrible place to get rulings from.

HOWEVER...I have found that what I like to call the "Cartoon Analogy" works very well, especially on the Legendary Fisherman/Marauding Captain thing. Basically, you try to picture it in your head (with correct rules and what not)and more often than not, you're right.

There was the duel where Joey dueled Mako the fish guy in battle city. When mako played Umi, The Legendary Fisherman went underwater and Joey couldn't see him. Picture it that way - with no visible monster on the field, you are free to attack his life points directly.

Now picture 2 Marauding Captains - they're both on the field and they're both right in front of you. You can't get to the life points until you get through all the "visible monsters" first...but you can't get through either of them because there's always one protecting the other one.
 
Back
Top