You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michizure chained during battle
- Thread starter benoit_vc
- Start date
daivahataka
Gold Member
I'm sure this was posted earlier but it seems to have gone missing:
From the ARRJ issue 2:
"Michizure" may not be activated to a monster being sent to the Graveyard as a result of Battle.
And as a member you should post such questions here instead:
http://www.igforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145
You'll usually get much quicker answers and it keeps everything neat and tidy.
From the ARRJ issue 2:
"Michizure" may not be activated to a monster being sent to the Graveyard as a result of Battle.
And as a member you should post such questions here instead:
http://www.igforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=145
You'll usually get much quicker answers and it keeps everything neat and tidy.
StRiKe_NiNjA
Dimension Shift Ninja
Yes true, but your in the Damage Step when the monster is being sent to the graveyard as a result of battle, so you would miss you chance to activate Michizure.
True you are still in the damage step. But you can active michizure in response to the effect of man-eater bug during the damage step.
I've read that on the netrep files. And that step is just before the send to graveyard step of the damage step.
If you can activate michuzre there then you can activate it 1 step later when your monster is sent to the graveyard. Otherwise the example I read is completetly wrong.
I've read that on the netrep files. And that step is just before the send to graveyard step of the damage step.
If you can activate michuzre there then you can activate it 1 step later when your monster is sent to the graveyard. Otherwise the example I read is completetly wrong.
daivahataka
Gold Member
From the ARRJ rulings I'd say you're supposed to just think of it as Michezure can only be activated in response to a monster being sent to the graveyard as a result of an effect. Does seem strange that UDE didn't catch it during their errata frenzy though...