There seems to be an obvious contradiction in the rulings for Non-Spellcasting Area.
Ruling 5. says
While ruling 10. says
How come 2 very similar cards in the same situation will yield such different outcomes? When you activate Burst Stream of Destruction with Non-Spell Casting Area on the field, your Blue-Eyes White Dragon CAN attack, but the same logic does not apply to Inferno Fire Blast and Red-Eyes Black Dragon? Is this some sort of elitist favoritism towards Kaiba fans?
Or am I missing something very basic here? Can they both be right at the same time?
Ruling 5. says
[Re: Burst Stream of Destruction] It is an effect of "Burst Stream of Destruction" that "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" cannot attack, so if "Non-Spellcasting Area" is on the field, "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" CAN attack. If "Imperial Order" is activated later, "Burst Stream of Destruction"'s effect is negated and "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" CAN attack.
While ruling 10. says
[Re: Inferno Fire Blast] If you activate "Inferno Fire Blast" while "Non-Spellcasting Area" is active, the effect of "Inferno Fire Blast" disappears.
How come 2 very similar cards in the same situation will yield such different outcomes? When you activate Burst Stream of Destruction with Non-Spell Casting Area on the field, your Blue-Eyes White Dragon CAN attack, but the same logic does not apply to Inferno Fire Blast and Red-Eyes Black Dragon? Is this some sort of elitist favoritism towards Kaiba fans?
Or am I missing something very basic here? Can they both be right at the same time?