Oh for God's sake, stop making new decks!

Complex_Mind said:
Flame? He stated his opinion on the deck and what he can do to fix it (change it.)

I don't really understand anyone on these boards, it's either crappy advice or none at all. No one is honest about anything and for once my brother (00Patience) is willing to state what everyone else would LIKE to say.

This deck will not work and pssvr refuses to take ANY advice, he never has.

I was using the general blanket statement of don't spam or flame. I never said he was flaming, I just thought it was spam, honestly. I'm sorry if the general nature of my statement caused a misunderstanding. I'm being sincere here too.

-chaosruler
 
chaosruler said:
-_-

BIASED? Please tell me that smiley means you're kidding, because I hate being falsely accused of things solely, because I dislike when someone takes the time and effort to post, but does nothing but say the deck sucks, and never offers any fixes. The effort of putting that up is more than they should use if that's their true opinion of the deck. If you have nothing constructive to say, don't say anything. I'm sorry, you have caught me in a bad mood, but we have offered advice (referring to your light deck), just because you chose not to take doesn't make it horrible and it doesn't mean it wasn't there for you to use.

okay, i'm done, sorry, had to get that out of my system. Nothing personal, okay? I just had to get that out of my mind :/ I think I'll go smash my head against a wall now. xD

-chaosruler

I have offered nothing but fixes, I do offend because people need to learn, not get patted on the back when they make something horrible. And that was a joke ";)"
 
Complex: Nothing but fixes? Yeah, nothing but fixes and the occasional flaming, but you know, details, of course. I will think about Blade Knight, although that is more of an aggro / chaos hybrid type thing.

And one more thing. I fail to see how that was a joke. A joke is when a statement is, in our mind, connected to some other statement, and this connection is amusing. Therefore, the punchline of the joke must in some way be relevant to something else. If, for example, one mod had been biased in the past, but had been kicked out of the council, I could see that as a joke. I know of no such situation, so how is it a joke?

-pssvr
 
pssvr said:
Complex: Nothing but fixes? Yeah, nothing but fixes and the occasional flaming, but you know, details, of course. I will think about Blade Knight, although that is more of an aggro / chaos hybrid type thing.

And one more thing. I fail to see how that was a joke. A joke is when a statement is, in our mind, connected to some other statement, and this connection is amusing. Therefore, the punchline of the joke must in some way be relevant to something else. If, for example, one mod had been biased in the past, but had been kicked out of the council, I could see that as a joke. I know of no such situation, so how is it a joke?

-pssvr

A joke is something in the eyes of the beholder. Let's get on topic now, eh? ;)
 
You'd like that, wouldn't you? Just forget about the argument, and move on? Well, I think maybe we should just














Do exactly that :D

On topic, can anyone else make this a little more control-ish? I'm determined to find a way to maintain field presence without monsters. I'm sure there is a way, I'm just not sure what it is yet.

-pssvr
 
Complex_Mind said:
Don Zaloog is still one of the best monsters out there. ;) Dark World isn't that bad. Two off the top, please. Also. Enemy Controller has 2 effects. And last time I checked Brain Control was limited to 3...not 4. ;)

Dons are overrated for sure...there are better options than that 1/1 trade. And that deck discard is just plain laffos, deck thin is good. Controllers are meh thanks to the position change rules, the second effect is pretty pointless if you were relying on it to save you.
 
pssvr said:
You'd like that, wouldn't you? Just forget about the argument, and move on? Well, I think maybe we should just
Do exactly that :D

On topic, can anyone else make this a little more control-ish? I'm determined to find a way to maintain field presence without monsters. I'm sure there is a way, I'm just not sure what it is yet.

-pssvr


Yeah, try locking the opponent with ojamas and those field limiters and then you can actually do something maybe.
 
Judicator said:
Yeah, try locking the opponent with ojamas and those field limiters and then you can actually do something maybe.
*Hands Judicator a pie* You win the most helpful award.

-pssvr
 
pssvr said:
You'd like that, wouldn't you? Just forget about the argument, and move on? Well, I think maybe we should just
Do exactly that :D

On topic, can anyone else make this a little more control-ish? I'm determined to find a way to maintain field presence without monsters. I'm sure there is a way, I'm just not sure what it is yet.

-pssvr

I don't have much of a choice, you already "reported me" my REP IS RUINED! :O!

Stall cards can keep control without a monster prescence, but that would transform this whole deck, Ojama tokens aren't really the best way, because they can be tributed and attacked with.

You could always make an Ojama deck if you haven't already. ;)
 
Complex_Mind said:
I don't have much of a choice, you already "reported me" my REP IS RUINED! :O!

Stall cards can keep control without a monster prescence, but that would transform this whole deck, Ojama tokens aren't really the best way, because they can be tributed and attacked with.

You could always make an Ojama deck if you haven't already. ;)

Besides the tributing part that chaoruler mentioned, i dunno if the opponent wants them in attack mode. >.>
 
INAPPROPRIATE POST!! NO CURSING! >_< [/moderated post]

-chaosruler
 
Back
Top