Thousand-eyes Vs. Ring of destruction

[exiledforcefreak]

My opponent summons sinister serpent and activates metamorphisis on it. My opponent special summons Thousand Eyes Restrict. My opponent activat's TER's effect on my Breaker. I chain to TER's effect with Ring of destruction and anouce TER as my target.

Resolution in reverse order:

Ring of destruction destroys TER. Does TER's effect dissapear or does it resolve, take my Breaker, then send my Breaker to the grave?

I'm gonna have to go with dissapear but I'm asking just to be on the safe side
Thx in advance :lol:

 

[lzy3]

i'm not sure whether TER's effect resolves or not, but it wouldnt send your breaker to the grave either way. it's effect is only IF TER is destroyed as a result of battle. ring of destruction wouldnt activate the effect, so your question only whether you guys take damage or not

 

[densetsu_x]

Short answer.

"Thousand-Eyes Restrict" (like "Relinquished") must be on the field for the effect to resolve.

Now my response question to EFF.

Why is this the case?

 

[exiledforcefreak]

cause TER's effect is continous?

 

[densetsu_x]

No, "Thousand-Eyes Restrict"'s effect is a Cost Effect.

However TER must be on the field for the effect to resolve since you are trying to equip a monster to it. If he's not on the field, the monster can't be equipped to anything so the effect disappears.

 

[exiledforcefreak]

:-o thought it was a trick question. I figured as much, thx