Tiso said:
When have I said it would work well in a tournament. I see, you are putting words in my mouth. A lot of Decks could be tourney worthy Decks if it was not for the fact that everyone CC in tourney.
Cyber Laser Dragon and
Cyber Barrier Dragon represent the perfect Defense and Offense. What is your opponent going to do when you have Dark Door out and both of those monsters? Not only is it easy enough for you to seal off any problems for Traps you may face, but also Spell Cards with little to no effort. But as I said, anything that involves a little effort is frowned upon, is considered crap by the marvelous CC tourney winning duelists in this game. Horus has not
Disappeared and it is still as annoying of a Deck to face as ever. That Deck can easily get to game over if the certain conditions are on the field, but as I just explained most of you (and I can assume you too) only care about winning through the tried true methods of CC that and this.
Im not trying to put anything in your mouth except whether or not you have been successful with playing any of the cards everyone has said sucks. The majority of us all say they are garbage. You are defending them without playing either, from what I gather. Scenario's only work on paper and we could simulate scenario after scenario, continually one upping each other until one of us gets tired and moves on.
The cards suck, period. No one here has provided anything more than conjecture on how they think they could be useful.
The cards are just like those stupid Movie Sphinx cards.
Now, if you have a deck you built, and it is successful, as I asked, then let all of us know so that we can have a real opinion. Everyone here knows how well the cards that can destroy them work,
Bottomless Trap Hole
Torrential Tribute
Solemn Judgment (on the Spell or Trap Card itself)
Zaborg the Thunder Monarch
which is why we can freely mention them. Unless you have a working Laser or Barrier Deck (or combined Deck), anything that is stated is how you would like it to work, on paper.
That's all I'm saying. We say they suck, we dont really have to prove our position since, well, they suck on paper to us, and none of us plan on using them...
And, I dont play Cookie Cutter. I grab a bunch of cards I like, and use them. If it happens to be similar to a winning deck, well, what's the saying, "Great minds think alike."
If I purposely copied a winning deck, then shame on me. But I am not going to build a deck from cards I think are potential garbage just to prove a point that I can get slaughtered at the expense of theme based originality.
I like winning. I like having fun. Winning is fun. When did 2nd place Trophy's become the rage?
I dont know about you, but no one celebrates losing more than winning. That's why when you lose, you're called a LOSER, not 2nd place winner. Its not even a fun name to be called, so again, what's fun about losing?