Search results

Well, it took all of his summer vacation to do it, but my son finally earned every pack in the dark beginning 1 box. The final result? 5 exodia pieces (two right arms, two left legs, one right leg, already had the head, but no left arm :( ) Hopefully he'll be able to do an Exchange to get the...

Yeah, if you could pull that off, get 3 DMs and then get your opponent with the Delta Attacker. Too bad it is for normal monsters only, then you could have a sweet and easy victory ;) I just hate that I can't use it on non-normal monsters. I spent an entire day building a deck around it and...

Now, here's a question to ask: If you had never seen the "originals" -- say the ones that were released in the US were the originals -- would you be complaining about any of those pictures? Would you be complaining that Soitsu didn't have a butt crack? Or Dark Ruler didn't have horns? Or...

There does seem to be a crossover story from Marauding Captain / Gagagigo / Kozaky / Inpachi. Marauding Captain is slicing Inpachi twice in "Double Attack", and he's attacking the Blazing Inpachi in Two-Man Cell Battle with Gagagigo/Giga Gagagigo. I think he's got a personal vendetta against...

Actually, the reason I'm getting a box is to save money. To keep my kid practicing his handwriting skills during the summer, I'm giving him a booster for every 8 pages he finishes. He absolutely hates writing, so I had to come up with a really good incentive. I figured out his rate of work...

Ok. I was suspicious of what I had seen, and now I know for sure that it wasn't true. Thanks.

If I were to buy an unopened box of a set, say Dark Beginnings 1 for instance, is it guaranteed to have at least 1 of every card in the set? I got that impression from a few ads I had seen a while back, but I'm suspecting it isn't the case -- that the odds are in favor of it, but it is not a...

Because I'm the burger. . .that bites back :D Just a funny card.

Ruling #2 on RO - RO destroys MC. So, actually, yes, you could use My Body as a Shield to prevent MC from being destroyed. But it wouldn't prevent the card being special summoned by MC from being destroyed, as you've indicated here.

Why yes, that is egg all over my face. Only is the not the same as Except. oops.

As I look at this again, I'm thinking that the question card asks for the name of the card. And therefore you would be justified in requiring the person to name the exact name on the card. I don't think I could ever prevent Mikazukinoyaiba from coming back onto the field unless it was staring...

Ha ha ha! I know the answer, I know the answer. I can't believe you all missed this. The answer is NO. You cannot special summon BLS-EotB back from the graveyard with any card. He's a NOMI monster. Aside from that point, what if the card at the bottom is "The Fiend Megacyber" and your...

So after a summon, player A has priority to respond with a spell speed 1 ignition effect, but not a spell speed 1 spell. Interesting. So could player 1 use priority to activate a spell speed 2 trap right after the summon of an effect monster (instead of activating the effect?) New scenario...

I'm still trying to understand the mechanics of how priority works, so I've put together a scenario to help me figure out one of the particulars: Player A, the turn player, has a face down Level Limit Area B. Player B has a face down Final Attack Order and a face down MST. Player A summons...

If they were mandatory effects, I could see that. But would you be able to say that you are activating 3 optional effects at once? I'm not so sure.

What if you use Miracle Dig to pull 3 Archfiend of Gilfers from out of play back to the graveyard? Would you be able to activate all 3, or just the last one?

Not that we would use the video game versions...but I was attacking with Jurai Gumo last night, called the coin flip wrong, had an odd number of life points at the time (175, to be exact). And it rounded up (to 88). This was on the "Power Of Chaos, Kaiba the Revenge". Odd coincidence that it...

Just for clarity and backing up with others have said: "including the Spell Card that is destroyed by this card's effect" cannot be referring to the card that you DISCARDED (but did not destroy) from your hand.

the reason is that the two are contradictory, which is exactly what the original post by Cerez was stating... I honestly don't think Spell Absorption will stop you from chaining counter traps to other spell cards. That doesn't seem like a very nice card if it did that... Oh how that would be...

That's an interesting perspective. So you're saying that you cannot chain magic jammer to any spell if spell absorption is on the field. Hmmmm....So why the reason for ruling #2?