Why Am I Using these Cards?: A Beginner's and a Veteran's Guide to Staples/Non-Staple

1. What is a Staple?
A Staple is a card that everyone uses, or that fits in *almost* every deck. There are tons of near staples, as well as staples. Near-staples are like staples, but fit into even less deck archetypes.

2. What qualifies a card to be a staple?
A card becomes a "staple" if it can be shown to provide effective and productive advantage to a deck, regardless of deck type.

Now, for the one true staple:
1) Pot of Greed - hand advantage wins games, pure and simple. If you really need my to say more as to why Pot of Greed should be in every deck (exception to HotU/Exodia decks), you should be slapped, a 2-1 trade nowadays is fantastic.

Now, to the other "staples" that don't compare to Pot of Greed:
2) Graceful Charity - this card gives you more options than Pot of Greed does, but this card is essentially a 1-1 trade, seeing as how you essentially replace Graceful Charity that you played with the card you keep, and you replace 2 cards in your hand that you discard for Graceful Charity.
3) Delinquent Duo - Yes, each card in the trinity is a staple. Delinquent Duo Provides a 2-1 trade in that it pre-negates 2 options for your opponent, unless it Backfires (Electric Snake, Night Assailant, Sinister Serpent). This card provides gamebreaking advantages, but is the most vulnerable to the sidedeck. This card is a staple solely because hand advantage wins games. It may be horrible late game, but the glory of it early to mid game outweighs the bad.
4) Sinister Serpent - This card is DEFINITELY a monster staple. Regardless of what people say, a free discard and a free meatshield for your LP? Where can you go wrong? Granted, impale effects will eat him alive, but that's situational. He's also great Metamorphosis food. Again, the HotU/Exodia deck can disregard each staple I've named so far, as it's spell engine (that barely exists) normally consists of 2 cards, each in multiples of 3.
5) Sangan - Another monster staple. Non-type-specific searchers? Almost always a good thing. Especially with the options that it gives you, it can help turn around most any situation. And most decks will hav ea few <1501 ATK monsters, and if you use Giant Rat, etc. they go to the field, usually in attack mode, which is not always the best place for them. Also, Reinforcement of the Army is type-stamped, so it's not as good, since it's for Warriors, it's almost as good, but just not quite there
6) Mystical Space Typhoon - I don't know many people who will seriously disagree with me when I say that MST is a staple. 1-1 spell/trap removal that can be used during the opponent's trun? Pretty sweet, if you ask me.
7) Premature Burial - Monster recursion, since when is that a bad thing? And with Tsukuyomi runnig rampant nowadays, the destruction effect of Premature Burial will not become a liability nearly as often.
8) Call of the Haunted - more monster recursion, but this can be during the opponent's turn. Alright, if you ask me. Again, Tsukuyomi cures the fears caused by the monster destruction half of CotH.

Now for all those near-staples:
1) Heavy Storm - this card is a necessity for most decks, however, a couple deck archetypes will want to avoid Heavy Storm, and only sidedeck it at best, such as Burn decks, Stall decks, etc. This card is also situational in the type of trade it gives you. Taht depends on how many s/ts each player has down. If you have none and your opponent has 4, then you get a phenomenal 4-1 trade. This can Backfire if you are trying to just kill a Swords of Revealing Light, and you have to destroy 2 of your own s/ts in the process. That would be a painful 1-3 trade, something you can't easily recover from.
2) Ring of Destruction - Monster Removal and damage in one card. This card is sweet, but also may not find a home in decks end up paying a lot of LP anyway, and Ring of Destruction may become a liability. This comes into play for Final Countdown, Skill Drain decks, and other deck archetypes.
3) Torrential Tribute - mass monster removal that can even be a X-1 trade? Count me in. Some decks, however, will not want to remove their field presence, or will not want to remove monsters that they gave their opponent, Lava Golem, anyone?
4) Lightning Vortex - Not all that great if you ask me. Granted, it can turn the course of the game around, but you have to sacrifice 2 cards to do it, and they can just chain Book of Moon and spare their monster.
5) Breaker the Magical Warrior - this card is awesome s/t removal, but will most likely only see play in offense-based decks, as it is not nearly as useful otherwise. You also get into the dilemma of breaking an opponent's face-down, or attacking their 1800 ATK monster first.
6) Mirror Force - I wanted to rate this as a staple, but I just couldn't. Granted, it's a staple for decks that are worried about attacks, but there are several deck types that don't worry about attacks.
7) Snatch Steal - I wanted this to be a staple to, but giving Life Points to the opponent normally means that this card will not see any play in Burn decks or Last Turn decks.
8) Swords of Revealing Light - one turn unconditional stall for 3 turns? Sounds nice to me. Too bad Silent Swordsman LV5, etc. can bow right through them.
9) Tribe-Infecting Virus - another near-staple, but it costs too much hand advantage to use, unless you're packing Night Assailants.
10) Mobius the Frost Monarch - the king of ice is a near-staple, mainly for the great s/t destruction, and being a 2400 beatstick. He also is an aqua type, which means if the opponent tries to use TIV on him, it's be a 1-2 trade for your opponent.
11) Jinzo - this guy shuts down an entire avenue of escape for your opponent. I don't use him too often, but he is a good card, and a very nice beatstick.
12) Nobleman of Crossout - this card is a near-staple with the amount of face-down monsters played in today's meta.
13) Magician of Faith - this card is a near staple in today's meta, as she is currently being abused like no one's business. A solid card, but very vulnerable to Nobleman of Crossout and face-down destroyers
14) Tsukuyomi - this beastly card is the advanced duelist's spirit monster, capable of taking down so many things, and providing for insane MoF abuse, happy Andrew?
15) Bottomless Trap Hole - at the behest of the mannerless Jathro >.<, I add this. This card does certainly PWN, and is basically a near-staple to survive in today's environment

What cards aren't staples?
Cards that only belong in certain decks are considered non-staples. These include Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning, Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys, D. D. Warrior Lady and D. D. Assailant.

That's it for today.
-chaosruler
 
If anyone has a card I haven't mentioned that I should have, please reply about it. It most likely slipped my mind.

-chaosruler
 
Noice article chaosruler. But i just have to ask, what exactly is Ring of Detruction?? I also have to dissagree with Sangan being a staple. What if your deck has no <1600 ATK monsters? Or, what if every monster you can search with Sangan you can get out faster and with more advantage with Giant Rat, Reinforcement of the Army, or Female Warrior of the Wilderness? ;)

Another card that is possibly staple is Skull Servant. Yup, he belongs in every deck I'd say...
 
Awesome article John! I like the detail you put in for the card use and weighing its options. I'm still a little iffy on the Duo. I think its effective as an early game play, but late in the game, if you're life points are suffering, you won't want to risk the lifepoints for something that a top deck will prove your demise. But that's just me 8^D

I'm surprised Jinzo has no mention in this article, staple or honorable mention. I understand how Bacon Lettuce Soldier seems to be the dominant force, but disregarding that, Jinzo is a 2400 that renders traps, a VERY important aspect of the game, immune. Only two traps in the game get rid of him and often enough you can keep your opponents effects at bay. How many cards are there in the game that are still labeled more as "Jinzo Killers" than anything else.
 
Great article! It is nice to see other people giving Tsukuyomi the recognition she deserves! I know I have always thought she was a great card and an amazing tool in the right deck. I know one of my favorite uses for her was in a deck with my Paladin of White Dragons and Mystic Swordsman, they can basically take down any large monster put out there and makes for a lot of frustration.
 
duo is surely not a staple, it cause be horrible during mid / late game were the roads have been set.

in the beggining / early game were you are still making your mind on what path to take it can be very good, it can force your opponent to go a certain way. but like people have stated you can do fairly well with out a duo in your deck.

accord that could be considered a mid staple would have to Scapegoat.

though decks can do with out, more often then not the 4 sheep can sometimes help.
 
Funny how you mention Tsukuyomi a couple of times with its usefulness with the staples, yet you didn't include it even as a near staple. I mean if the card is being played that much more now, don't you think it should be added in there somewhere, even in the "close but not quite" category?
 
They are, but I don't use them. Also, they aren't really staples, just commonly played cards. There is a difference

-chaosruler
 
Book of Moon, only a "commonly played card"?

A card that versetile (sp?) goes in any deck type, and is incredibly helpful in loads of situations. How in the world did Sangan become a staple, and Lightning Vortex a near-staple, while BoM didn't even make the list?

Book of Moon stops attacks, protects from several card effects (including such "staples" of yours as Ring of Destruction, Snatch Steal, Mirror Force, and Lightning Vortex), can shut down the effects of such monsters as Jinzo, Breaker the Magical Warrior, and others, and allows you to re-use flip effects. At the very, very least, Book of Moon is a near staple, and a full staple IMHO. In fact, what deck types would this not go well in?

Another near staple (if not full) is Solemn Judgment. The ability to stop nearly any combo your opponent trys to use is immensely helpful, regardless of your deck type. The price may be a little steep early in the game, but is well worth it to stop a combo of your opponents that would have otherwise killed you. At the very least, this card deserves a place in every side deck...

In addition, I would like to voice my opinion that while Sangan is a useful card in certain decks, it is most definately not a staple (Maybe a near staple, but that's it). Regardless of the atk of monsters in your deck, spending a turn to summon it could instead have been used to summon or set a monster with a better (more direct) effect. Since Sangan generaly takes two turns for the effect to become of use to you, your opponent may already have a counter-measure prepared by the time you finally get that monster out. It may have a decent effect, but Sangan is just too slow.

And finally, in your last section, of non staples, it would probably be better to change that line from
Cards that only belong in certain decks are considered non-staples. These include.....
to
Cards that only belong in certain decks are considered non-staples. These include, but are not limited to.....

, Cause I can think of a whole heckuva a lot of "deck-specific staples" that you didn't include in that list, lol.
 
actually, you can get staples from looking at the top 8 deck lists for nats, once nats is done with we can see what other peoples deck look like when its time for worlds.


seriously anything can be a staple if its used alot.
 
krazykidpsx said:
seriously anything can be a staple if its used alot.

I do not consider BLS to be a staple, even though it seems as though everyone uses it, or tries to, at least....
 
ask them if the soldier is a staple.

lol

see what kind of answer youll get.

really, we know the soldier isnt a staple, but if you abuse of a card that much really, people will start saying, oo thats a staple thats a staple you need it it, i dont care if it doesnt go with your deck, just using it is godly.
 
Soldier isn't a staple. Is that what you expected Krazy?

I don't use him, I see no need to use the most broken card in Yu-Gi-Oh! to win, I win otherwise.

-chaosruler
 
OMG!

how dare you say that i belive the soldier is a staple, you of all people know that i made a deck to anahilate the soldier.


Im stating that something used alot will later be called a staple, look at The forceful Centry and Confiscation.

were they not used so much people started calling them staples?


how about Mirror Force, and ring and call, and premature, and MST (come on its limited to 1, yet people put it in every deck)

Painful Choice, everybody used to run that, was that a staple?
 
Meh, staple is a dynamic word. It changes with the metagame. There, that's my final input on the subject. XD

Krazy, I'm hoping that was sarcasm at the beginning of your post, otherwise I'm going to worry about you. >>

-chaosruler
 
Back
Top