Recent content by -Xe0-

Are you sure about this? The effect of D.D. Survivor also says that he must be removed on the same side as the RFG-Pile he goes through or am i wrong ?? "If this face-up card on your side of the field is removed from play,..." (Monsters always go to the RFG-Pile of the owner i suggest!) greetz Xe0

So on the other hand the ruling says that, if only one monster is on the field this one monster is destroyed. Here comes the problem. Look at the rulings of Greenkappa. Greenkappa says almost the same like the Nobleman-Eater Bug but the targets are face-down Trap/Magiccards. The difference at...

Ok i´m glad with this. I wasn´t sure cause of the different rulings in the registry. thx for this help ^^ greetz Xe0

In my oppinion it that is not the best thing for the TurnPlayer. For example: Player A declares an attack with his mighty Gemini Elf on a lovely Scapegoat. In his hand he got an Enemy Controller he wants to use to turn the Sacpegoat in attack position. Player B on the other side got a face-down...

Hi, I found this question and wasn´t sure how the right answer would be: Player A summons his Vampire Genesis. He calls priority to use the effect, discards a monster and set as target a Ryu Kokki in his graveyard. Now Player B reponses to the summon with a Bottomless Traphole. So VG´s effect...

I post it to the judge´s list just a week ago. I opened this threat cause i get no answer from the list ^^ greetz Xe0

So its your opinion that the TurnPlayer has priority to response to his own attack? Got anything offical about this ?? If yes it would clear up many questions that are waiting in my head to be answered. greetz Xe0

Why "before" he attacks. The first thing to happen in battle step is the declaration of an attack. Then one player can response. In my oppinion there is nothing before that! greetz Xe0

Oh thats new to me. All the effects you listet up are optional Triggereffects to me, like a Mystic Tomato and so on. I never heard the frase IgnitionEffect for this kind before. (Got anything offical about this?) Going straight forward to my example and create a new one: Player A attacks...

The second attack of BLS is an optional Triggereffect i though. Its also SpellSpeed 1 but a Triggereffect :) My opinion is, that Exarion´s Effect is a Multi-Trigger-Effect that can be chained. For example: Player A enter his BattlePhase he declares an attack with Exarion on Player B´s...

Hi guys, first of all i like to say i hit the search-button and found this nice threat: http://www.cogonline.net/threads.11891&page=1 There is a question about the kind of effect that exarion has and its ends up in a declaration to an Ignition-Effect. I got some question about this: 1. Isn´t an...

So correct me if i´m wrong. I followed up the link and now i`m thinking that i can use Fusion Recovery in my example? Mhh ... so i´m just sitting, waiting and wishing for an offical answer to come :) greetz Xe0

Generally its a SpellSpeed 2 Effekt that can be used in either players turn. But according to the correct card-text it is limited to your own MainPhase 1+2 and your opponents BattlePhase. greetz Xe0

So that brings up the question how long is a monster stated as used for a Fusionsummon. For example: I play Polymerization to Fusionsummon my nice Sanexe. Then i play De-Fusion to bring both Monsters back to the field. After that one of these monsters is destroyed by battle or anything else. Is...

Hi folks, i just looked up for a Ruling for Fusion Recovery and didn´t find it. So please help me with this: When i activate this card there must be a "Polymerization" AND a Monster used for a Fusionsummon in my Graveyard right? Also i found a ruling i am a little confused about: "You can use...