Search results

  1. D

    Tricky chains with FF + Chimeratech

    I think I've found another possibility: Activate Future Fusion, targetting Chimeratech Over Dragon - Now during the second Stand-By Phase I have a face-down Spell Canceller. Chimeratech is summoned (his effect will immediately trigger) - To the effect I Chain Ceasefire. Ceasefire resolves...
  2. D

    Tricky chains with FF + Chimeratech

    yes, this is the scenario I was trying to explain. Sorry if my text was confusing. So COD will remain... interesting. I searched the answer to this question and didn't find it. Well, my KOF deck has another trick... (I recently got my 2nd Chimeratech, and it's a gorgeous ultimate rare card...
  3. D

    Tricky chains with FF + Chimeratech

    I was thinking about Chimeratech "When this card is Fusion Summoned, send all the cards on your side of the field to the Graveyard except this card." part of the effect and one interesting question popped up: what if I have a set Call otH in the 2nd stand by phase after I activated FF, and when...
  4. D

    Forced Back To Playground YGO?

    yeah, I know. And in the thread I argued it too. But many of the participants kept saying that it is legal. Also another situation discussed: TP has a Blade (not busted) in face-up attack position and is in his Battle Step. NTP has a face-up Chiron the Mage and a set Sak. TP declares Blade...
  5. D

    Forced Back To Playground YGO?

    You know, this last thing you posted is annoying. Man, I really can't agree that if both pass TT would be still activated. And even worse... in another thread, some time ago, the discussion came to a point in which many claimed that the following situation could happen: NTP has 2 set cards...
  6. D

    Ring of Destruction "game tie" rules?

    By the way, I completely forgot it (more than a year without using Ring lol) if the game 1 is a tie, who starts the second game? The same person that started game 1, right? Or is it necessary to roll a dice again?
  7. D

    hydrogeddon

    thanks masterwoo0. Now I better comprehend.
  8. D

    hydrogeddon

    Just a quick one about Hydrogeddon too: Its text is: When this card destroys an opponent's monster as a result of battle and sends it to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon 1 "Hydrogeddon" from your Deck. Why if he destroys a spent Breaker he doesn't activate its effect, and it's a...
  9. D

    quick one: checking CotH

    If I have, let's say, a Cyber Dragon special summoned with Call and my opponent destroys it in battle with Jinzo, does Call remains meaninglessly on the field or goes to graveyard? If I special summon my Jinzo with Call and it's destroyed latter, does Call remain or goes to grave? I'm...
  10. D

    BTH being activated after TP announces he wants to proceed to BP

    I'm on the group that believes that only one opportunity to respond to an event (a response window) is enough and there should be no exception and it simplifies the game and makes sense. Oh and it's coherent too. But it's YGO right? Sometimes the rules of the game doesn't follow logic... But...
  11. D

    BTH being activated after TP announces he wants to proceed to BP

    Thank you for the replies. It's just as I thought. And thanks specially to you John, and sorry to bother with this kind of question again... Oh, and about the 2nd question? When TP declares he wants to move to BP and NTP says: "wait... still in your MP1 I activate Waboku or TR". Can TP...
  12. D

    BTH being activated after TP announces he wants to proceed to BP

    Scenario: NTP has a f/d BTH and a set monster. He has activated Confiscation and knows that his opponent has only one Mobius in hand now. TP draws a Cyber Dragon. He enters his MP1, special summons his CD and passes his opportunity to respond. NTP doesn't activates BTH, betting TP will summon...
  13. D

    timing w/sak

    And I'll insist... My post above seems exactly like the example John gave: This, however, would be legal... P1 Declares attack w/ Gemini Elf and passes priority. P2 Does not wish to respond at this time. P1 Announces they wish to move into damage step. P2 Activates Sakuretsu Armor /...
  14. D

    timing w/sak

    I thought a little bit more about all this thread and found another weird example abut this issue (both passing and TP activating some spell speed 2 effect like BTH or TT)... NTP has a set S/T. TP summons a monsters in his MP1 (he had only one card in hand). TP pass and NTP passes too. TP...
  15. D

    timing w/sak

    All right Kyhotae. I have considered this argument too. But it involves some assumptions that are not "really official" too. I can see logic in your argument and I can even almost agree with it. But I still see a problem. If after both passed, TP decides to activate some spell speed 2 effect...
  16. D

    timing w/sak

    Hehe. It's true. I appreciate your work and thank you for bringing the official opinion. But I'm glad that at the very least my arguments (and the arguments from many others) make sense. And I would like to see one day this answer clarified specifically in the judge list... Thanks
  17. D

    timing w/sak

    I'm sorry to insist, and I know the game is about having fun as Dan said. But when you are playing a tournament, specialy the "big ones" you play it at least a bit seriously. And I believe we have to know most of the rules and the mechanics to play correctly. And when real situations happen...
  18. D

    timing w/sak

    So DaGuy, just to clarify, you agree with me? And I throw some more insights: When an action without spell speed is performed by TP, I believe we have to assume that once both pass the opportunity to respond to the action, this response opportunity MUST end. In the battle step, we can...
  19. D

    timing w/sak

    John, sorry but I will insist a bit more. I was thinking about this whole "response window" that some people (like me) believe is ended when both players pass. The analogy with the main phase is inevitable, and I may be missing something or even using a bad example, but I will try to explain...
  20. D

    timing w/sak

    But John, the thing is, both passed the opportunity to respond directly to the attack. Doesn't that close the chance of cards like "when opponent declares an attack" being activated?
Back
Top