Search results

Well, in despite of all the problems this thread had, I have some points I would like to comment: Returning to the original point, a situation occoured in a important tournament here: TP was in his Battle Step and had a face-up Blade Knight, a Enemy Controller in his hand and 3 other cards...

Okay, and about the first question? The effect can't be used in the damage step right? Thanks.

Some clarifications about the new FAQ rules for LW: 1) You can choose the timing for when you Special Summon for the effect of "Last Will". You can Special Summon the monster at any time during your turn, except during damage calculation. You do not have to Special Summon the monster at the...

SAKURETSU ARMOR "Sakuretsu Armor" targets 1 monster. This discussion is a confusing one. Sakuretsu's text says: You can only activate this card when your opponent declares an attack. Destroy the attacking monster. I really don't see how can a monster that had his attack declared...

I was wondering about the enter/ end phases and the TP decisions about which phase he wants to start mechanics and checking this thread http://www.cogonline.net/threads.14988&page=6&pp=15&highlight=battle+position+change, and I realize I am still confused. So, what is the more accurate way...

All right, I'm confused. So when a monster like Drillroid battles another, something like this happens: TP declares his Drillroid attacks a face-down monster... neither player wants to activate something and damage step MUST be entered. The monster is flipped face-up, destroyed and the...

Interesting to see LJM effect's in discussion again. I saw in other thread people saying its effect would work even if he is attacked by MS LV 2, Drillroid etc I searched for more information, and I found in the upperdeck official site: """Legendary Jujitsu Master If "Legendary...

Here in my location, when OCG list is announced, people imediately change theirs decks and say that they are already testing. This **** me off so bad (specially when BLS was playing his last days)... Well, about the ban list, I hope Graceful will not return for us. This would make Dark World...

It's good to Know you, John, agrees with this too.

Thanks Jason_C. And I am on the group that believes TP always retains priority after an action, including: summon, flip summon, declaration of an attack, draw at the DP. Why? Because this would make all the mechanics "similar" and much more reasoneable, don't you think? But, let's wait.

I was wondering about some situations with MC and replays, and I want to check: 1) Well, it's in fact general: do we have some official "clue" until this moment about if TP retains priority after an attack is declared? Or there isn't any official answer yet? I'm asking this because this...

Oh God... here we go again. First: The TOOTCOTLETR gains priority is not completely accepted. I am in the group that believes priority always go to TP after a chain resolves. But this will not end until an official answer. Can't someone ask Curtis or Kevin about this matter? I've tried to...

Interesting... for me, it's the same case as: I have one face-up Lava Golem and my opponent has one of my monsters with Snatch Steal attached. I enter my Stand By and this two effects have to be resolved, and I believe both are mandatory. Okay, I once asked what would happen if I have less than...

I understand. So Nova's point is that when TP announces he would like to end MP1, for example, he must imediately tell NTP he intend to go BP or EP (what means he is passing), and NTP can respond activating something, then TP can chain etc. After this chain resolves, TP has to declare again: I...

So, is it aGreed that the decision of the TP about for wich phase he will move occours in a kind of "parallel non phase window" after a phase is completely ended (both agreeing), right? Wait... thinking a little more, it seems more accurate to say that the decision was already made (inside...

all right Skey and slither, but does this state exists in the judge list? Or not? Thanks and sorry to be bothering you.

Oh, no! You are kidding BenjaminMS. I believed that after a chain resolves, no matter who had the last effect resolved, priority would always returns to TP. I asked in this forum and saw so many threads about this matter, and many people says "the opponent of the controller of the last...

Does anyone have a link of the judge's list stating that the opponent of the controller of the last effect resolved (or activated? even if resolved with no effect?) in the last chain "gains" priority to start a new chain? (I'm trying to convince a person that it's kind of official) And to...

Does anyone have a link of the judge's list stating that the opponent of the controller of the last effect resolved (or activated? even if resolved with no effect?) in the last chain "gains" priority to start a new chain? (I'm trying to convince a person it's kind of official) And to clarify...

Wow, living and learning... But it is way too strange... To be honest, it doesn't seem to be accurate. Isn't declaration of an attack considered an action? And doesn't it have similar summon "mechanics" ? If this can be done with Negate Attack, then I see no reason why the same can't be done...