Search results

I fully understand how Apprentice works. I never planned to swap them my Apprentice. It is there to get MoF out so I can get Shien's Spy or Creature Swap back from grave to use again. And Mystic Box is coming out in the Spellcaster Structure Deck, so I will have to do an update with this deck...

I am really going to try to make it to this one. Just have to talk my wife into letting me go, lol. Missed out on Indy, so this is probably the last chance for along time.

Here is my newest version of my Ameba Burn deck. Shien's spy from CRV has really helped this deck out. Deck Name: One Cell Burn Author: Papewaio Count: 42 Monsters: 18 Tribute: Non-Tribute: Ameba Ameba Ameba Apprentice Magician Apprentice Magician Apprentice Magician Cyber Jar...

Here was my Ameba burn with Shien's Spy Deck Name: One Cell Burn Author: Papewaio Count: 42 Monsters: 18 Tribute: Non-Tribute: Ameba Ameba Ameba Apprentice Magician Apprentice Magician Apprentice Magician Cyber Jar Magician of Faith Magician of Faith Magician of Faith...

I believe it starts Oct. 10th at 5pm and 10pm (assuming that is EST) on Cartoon Network.

Once this card came out, it made my Ameba burn deck much more playable. I don't have my deck list here at work, but I will post it tonight when I get home. My deck plays alot like skey23 described it. The 3 Spys, 2 Swaps, 3 MoF's, and 3 Amebas, means alot of swapping going on. Add in a couple...

So his effect would have to be activated before you got to the damage step, or would it work like Injection Fairy Lily, where you can activate it during the damage step. For example: Player 1 Has Exarion Universe on the field Player 2 Has fd monster in def position Player 1 Attackd fd...

• You cannot activate "My Body as a Shield" during the Damage Step, so you cannot use it against a "Man-Eater Bug" or "Cyber Jar" flipped by an attack, but you can use it when these monsters are Flip Summoned. Thas is the Official Ruling on the UDE FAQ.

That brings up a good question. Does priority also pertain to the battle phase? For example, wouldn't you as turn player be able to declare an attack before your opponent could activate any cards? Obviously, they should just activate whichever card they wish to activate (if they can)...

I am not agreeing with Kevin's ruling on this, but just trying to see what kind of logic he may be using. TP summons monster. Summons is not negated (i.e. by SJ or HoH). TP does not use his priority to start a new chain. OP does not respond to summons. At this point the last thing to...

Ok here is the situation. I have Pinch Hopper and Sangan, both in face up atk position on my side of the field. I have an insect monster in my hand. I attack and my opponent activates Mirror force destroying both of my monsters. My question is, will Pinch Hopper still get its effect as...

I recommend the following guidelines for fair play regarding priority. If your opponent summons a monster with an effect or has an effect monster they can use on the field already when they summon another monster, ask them if they wish to use their priority to activate one of their monster's...

Lol, typed to much and other's beat me to replying.

First, Trap Hole and Bottomless Trap Hole do not negate a summons. They wait until the summons is successful and then destroy or remove the monster from play. If the summons was negated by cards like Horn of Heaven or Solemn Judgement, the summons never happened. So if the summons was...

One benefit this will provide is that players can use cards from the new sets in a tournament environment to test out how they might work in their decks before a big event. Otherwise, they are stuck with the random play-testing they might do with their friends or online with YVD and such. The...

Maybe I am mis-speaking, but wasn't Archfield of Gilfer the reason why they created that game mechanic in Japan in the first place? Woodland Sprite + Archfiend of Gilfer going to the grave for any reason = GG. I remember being at a tourney (not judging) and observing the final match in which...

Ok, if the location of activation is where cost is paid, then why doesn't EoA negate Peten? Its cost is paid in the Graveyard. By your logic, its effect should activate in the graveyard then, and EoA should negate it. However, it has been ruled otherwise. Removing Peten is a cost. Once that cost...

The End of Anubis is a great answer to the infusion of Zombie/Chaos Hybrids as well as anything that splashes in Sacred Phoenix. Zombie Lord has to sit on the bench in the graveyard, and Sacred Phoenix must remain among its ashes never to be reborn. Your opponent won't be able to ram his tutor...

This is taken straight from the Official Rulebook version 5.0 Pay a Cost Paying a cost means an action like discarding or sending a card to the Graveyard from your hand, or paying Life Points, in order to Summon a monster or activate an effect. You have to pay any costs before you declare...

And if costs and activation are simultaneous, why isn't the cost refunded when the activation and effect of a card is negated? It isn't refunded, because you pay the cost first, then you may activate the card's effect.