Search results

Slate Warrior?

...cascades of marshmellows...

Exactly. Its so boring to go to a site where all they talk about is CC...every deck you post gets a Mobius, Smashing Ground, and Sak Armor added...and no one understands the more complex decks. Basically, I get the aura of, "who cares about those other cards, bash them with what everyone else...

Thanks guys =) I finally lost one to him, lol.

Maybe its because I haven't slept well, or at all. Maybe I'm hungry. Maybe I'm tired of arguing rulings and mechanics with this particular individual. But I need clarification, or at least some reasoning or proof on this one. See, I always took it as a given that the effect of Backfire...

hey, could you CML for secret Magic Cylinder x1, Mirror Force x1, and which Dark Magician is it? 001 or 007?

...in mid-January

...produced by volcanoes...

*frowning* Good point. For some reason I was overlooking that. ....-_-** yes, I agree, DJ is very good at explaining things, lol

I did, you can't use them. Soul Exchange allows you to tribute a monster on your opponent's side of the field, and its still considered on their side. Meaning cards that specify "on your side of the field" won't work. And thanks for the clarification Neil =) Finally, you might want to try...

I don't think I'll be able to answer all of these as well as some others might on here, but here goes a shot. Edit: Hmm...*after looking up stuff on Metamorphosis and Soul Exchange with more time* I dunno...^_^ Why can't you tribute a face-down on your opponent's side with Metamorphosis...

Right, the card doesn't require you to have a monster on the field. And like soulwarrior used in the example, it doesn't need to be for a Tribute summon either.

Because everyone is looking for a definite place. Yes, its going to the graveyard, but like masterwoo0 said, from where? If its not from the field, or hand, and can't be from anywhere else, where is it considered placed until it does hit the graveyard??

Maybe I adhere too much to reason, and being so avoid those "plays" you speak of. Although the similarity between winning decks bores me too. But I do know at least two other people who will pull a move...simply to pull that move, to have...finesse

Right, and I understand that. They do at least make sense, moreso than other things.

>_< ok, so if whatever it requires/is targetting is no longer there, the effect Disappears...I'm just gonna keep on reading.

Which works well, I understand better with examples :) So isn't it resolve without effect? Since gateway resolves, taking up the necessary slots; Ojama Trio is still trying to resolve, but since it doesn't have enough slots, its effect cannot be completed, thus it does resolve, but with no...

Ok, so I'm following that the card cannot resolve due to lack of slots. Someone care to explain what the exact difference between "resolving without effect" and "Disappearing" is?

You can't connect GBA games on DS as far as I've seen. And you can't use the wireless thing with them either, it has to be a DS game. Only option left to connect GBA games with a link cable is to use a GBA or SP.

Hm, thats true. Problem is Mask of Restrict wouldn't be able to last long. Anyone ever attempt a Fenrir-based deck? Something separate from a water beatdown?