Search results

Hmm, before anything, I'm assuming TP retains priority after he declares an attack. Negate Attack is a counter trap, and as such, it must be directly chained to what it's trying to negate, right? Or it's the only exception to this type of card (counter traps)? Because it could cause strange...

Timing will only be lost for cards with "declares an attack requirements" if the response window ends (both passing) or if the chain speed-up for SS 3 , right? And just to confirm: Negate Attack can only be activated imediately in answer to a declared attack and eats TP priority to respond...

All right... First: Thanks Jason_C, the point that I was trying to clear with this thread is exactly this priority matter. And I was inclined to believe that after the current chain resolves (in the case, Premature special summoning a monster) priority would return to the turn player. But this...

First of all, I wanna say it's kind a dumb question. But it came to my attention recently, when I caught myself questioning about this... I activate Premature Burial or Call of the Haunted targeting my Chaos Sorcerer on the grave in my turn (let's say it's MP1). My opponent doesn't "negate"...

I've read Curtis article at metagame.com and just to clarify, let me ask about 2 situations (I think there are some points I didn't understand): 1) TP summons Strike Ninja. NTP has 2 fd s/t (trap hole and BTH). NTP responds with TH (link 1). TP decides to use Ninja's efffect (Link 2)...

All right. When the discussion is at a high level I prefer not to post but read and learn. But now, this topic is making me doubt about all the concepts I believed were solid and completely accepted. I believed the concept TP retains priority after an "action" (draw in the DP, summon or...

It makes sense, and I think it's the way it is. But it contradicts the rulebook, since there, still in the damage step it's decided if another battle step will be done. Just another error? For sure. And it's a relevant thing, since it has strategics implications.

It also makes sense because every DW is being special summoned by their own effects, not a single effect like Cyber Jar case.

Ah, then that's the way I first thought it would be... it's a SEGOC case, with lots of mandatory effects of P1 becoming the first links. Thanks Skey.

Thanks Daguy. And just to keep on... I still want a consistent answer about my last reply, please...

Someone please, help me with this...

So, let's say P1 has 5 DW monsters (3 Goldd and 2 Sillvas, just to abuse), he plays CD. Their 5 DW will be link 1 and opponent's eventual DW will be link 2. Is this correct? If payer 2 activates BTH by the time 5 DW were summoned by player 1, all of them will be removed then, right? Thanks.

Vacation means lots of new threads. This time it's about two players playing DW decks. Situation: P1 has Sillva, Goldd and Card Destruction. P2 has Goldd in hand. Both have nothing else on the field and in yhe hands. P1 activates CD. Now, his 2 DW will be link 1 and 2 in the resolution...

__________ Okay John, and this I know. I know I can stil activate an Appropriate card in the end step (after the damage step). But my point is, pay attention to this detail, that if I activate CotH in the end step, it's too late for that monster to enter a battle step, if all my other monsters...

Thanks for the answers. Questions 1 and 2 were just to check, but I want a special attention to question 3. In the rulebook (I'm talking about Warrior's Triumph version), a new battle step can only be started right after the damage step. For me, this means that if I don't have any monster able...

All right, here we go: 1) I can enter the BP even if I have no face-up monsters when main phase 1 ends, right? (intending to activate CotH, Gateway to DW etc). 2) Can I enter the BP even if I don't intend to attack or make a move at all? 3) I enter the Battle step with one monster face-up...

Now I understood... sorry. And agree with your point.

Skey and pssvr... wouldn't it be more consistent if this model applies to all phases, except damage step? The following situation, at least for me, shows a legal situation that would occour during Draw Phase: P1 begins his turn, drawing a card. He passes priority. P2 respond to the draw...

Wow, I wanted an answer and I got a whole discussion (and I liked very much this discussion, because it answered a lot of my questions) But just to re-confirm: So, is it aGreed that Skey23 statement is correct and accurate? (in my opinion-well, it's not much relevant- it is) This model of...

Okay, let's put some more details: Same situation, opponent declares an attack with Blade (1600 atk) to my Chiron. Opponent has priority to respond to the attack, as he is the turn player. He chooses not to respond. Then priority passes to me, and as Blade is still weaker than Chiron I choose...