Search results

thks, guys. i know i have to follow tha card's text. and i know im making a big wave out of a pond. the thing is, that if someone reads the same ruling, people will get confused. another point is perfection. im not saying that EVERY card and his ruling has to be perfect, but just to be a little...

sure i will post it. and thanks for the explination, the thing is, im still with that d&&) bug. i know that if i discard RFTVoH from my hand from, lets say, TIV effect/magic jammer/monster reincarnation. i know that it is in fact a trigger effect, and when those cards effects are resolved...

again, with the doubt...... i know that i must use common logic on this, and it's like asking "hey, my card doesn't states that it has to die" sort of questions. im just confused by this matter and i have to ask this. could someone explain to me, in kids words if you like, where in the...

you have my vote right here......i was the only one playing zombies way before the zombies SD was released, and i did my sharing of wins. now that zombies r destined to be the next cookie deck, i need to upgrade my deck. (beasts,anyone?)

thank's, my bad on the name, though, and i didn't intended to call you guy's "misleading". i had a similar case with dark mirror force text, but i did found a forum on wich to put that case (wich, by the way, hasn't changed). you guys do a heck of a job lendig this page as a tool to anyone who...

i need someone's help, here....i think i saw an error on the netrep page regarding "the roc from the valley of haze". it's more like a "misleading" paragraph. to ilustrate, here's the text i was looking for. "the roc from th valley of haze" Card Text When this card is sent directly from...

buahh...men, that's what i want to do, but here in mexico, it almost impossible to make yourself a judge. but, good things come to those who wait.

thank you....i think that about covers it.

thks for putting this up, but now im confused again....does the effect of level monsters, when the have legaly achieved their "summoning their next leve", is mandatory?

LOL........thaks guys, with this, i can "stand someone corrected" =)

just to make sure. if i have a mystic swordman lv4 and attack and destroy a monster card, do i have to "forcefully" make his effect?. in other words, do i have to summon the next level (lv 6) of mystic swordsman?. what happens if i dont have that card?...do i still send the mystic swordsman...

MUCHISIMAS GRACIAS!!!!!!!! thank you vey much....that was the only thing i need it to know........keep up the GREAT work u do, guys....i, for one, will be forever gratefull!!!!

mmm...ok..let me put it in another way. 1.- does "divine wrath" negating effect's effect is similar to ha des? i guess that this is the escence of the question. in the other hand, if yes is the answer. 1a.- if i revive a monster, his effect wouldn't return, because "divine wrath" effect...

so...in short, if i zap a ddwl when trying to remove a monster, that effect is negated, and even if i revive her, the effect is still negated??

it does, well, in the official page says so. that if my oponent has a royal opression, it would comeback next standby...

i was saying that because IF you kill something, like grat dezard, having achieved his first effect, and bring it back with monster reborn, coth, etc. his effect would be reset, needing to kill another monster to get again his first effect...i know that he his in the graveyard when he,s negated...

hi again, ppl. something quick. i know that vampire lord, if it's destroyed by a card effect, it comes back to the field. but i was wondering (and i think i saw this on another thread) that if he's destroyed when atempting to come back from the graveyard (his first effect) with divine wrath's...

i think...for my part...that that was that!!!... i think i get the picture now, u guys....thank you. u r quite dedicated to this busines....KUTGW!!

....and soon, protector of the graveyard will be unchained and starts to run ammock the world of yugi.... like if that could happen. the way i see it, ppl, is that if both monsters (bare with me, im not a judge nor someone who knows all the rules, it's just a logical aproach to the...

so, even if you dont make damage to the life points (with waboku still in effect) the damage step has to be done. the damage step is sort of like a "formality", even if you dont make damage to the life poitns..mmm. i understand the case before, that BLS would die because of the effect of ryu...