Search results

Also of note is the case in which the opponent chains a trap, and a rewind would then reveal the opponent's trap.

If the hacking work, the hacker won. Prevention is the only way to win. Anyway, have you reported this to the authorities?

Interesting. The system uses more than 4 bytes.

The only sport I'd like to do on a regular basis is sparring, but no one I know is interested. And here: http://goodexperience.com/tib/b/2004/02/gym_entrance.html

Making a new game would distract Blizzard fans from WoW, which makes money continuously.

This idea does not seem to be self-sufficient.

skey: Just link the old topics and don't mention opinion, unless you'd like to start the argument again.

The three-D thing isn't that hard. Your eye is seeing two slightly different images, which is what 3D is. The hard part is getting all of those images into a single piece of plastic without ruining the view. Microtechnology much?

I wish they would burn Leaf Fairy.

Between me and SHAKK2Racing from Edo's, we had two duels. In the end, it came down to my dirty, dirty luck, and in spite of my complete ignorance about what my cards actually did. The duel logs are posted here: http://edos.siteburg.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=17067#17067 It might not be...

Are many of you interested in dueling online with special rules? I won't be participating much, but I started something at Edo's (yes, we're still alive) and, if there are many online duelists here, I thought you could try it too. It might be difficult since, as far as I know, there's no...

Did you really lose your job to outsourcing? :(

For the Pot of Greed effect, anyway. There might be judges out there who would let you use it as Jar of Greed, and there might be others that punish you for causing unnecessary confusion and using a card as a proxy. UDE probably has the stance of the latter.

You mean "if you claim you can". Mostly, this hurts collectors. There's usually going to be someone richer than you anyway, meaning they already have access to cards you don't. Releasing these cards as commons levels the playing field for those who can't afford the higher-end cards as-is.

Why do so many people spell "ridiculous" that way? >_> As you said (or I should say, "According to you", because I shouldn't give the false impression that I've actually READ the things), it's not very clear even after the change. Maybe it doesn't qualify as errata because they're not admitting...

I thought I already stated how, but here's some more, then: It's usually a sign of ignorance of how the board works (not so bad) or laziness (which annoys people). Or spamminess (the "+1 postcount" mentality), which USUALLY means that the person has a lot of contentless posts. It doesn't...

Using Imageshack? Use forum code 1. Here:

I think it is wrong, and I point it out. I think it's wrong for masterwoo0 to pretend that there's no advantage, and I call him on it. I'm not one of those people who let things go just because I'm not personally negatively affected. As for calling him a liar, he's twisting the truth...

I saw that the first time, yes. That sounds an awful lot like an accusation of malice. Yes, I like it better. That's why I said it was better. Do you disagree? And I said that monsters don't have priority with the "actual" definition (i.e. the one which higher-level judges use). I also said...

In other words, I'm being bitter. What did I already tell you? I CAN'T be bitter. I don't have the card, and I don't even play the game. I don't really know anyone who uses Victory Dragon, either. So your attempt to dismiss my point of view as "bitterness", and thus "unreasonable", doesn't...